The Problem With Porn Research
January 13, 2016 by Justin Lehmiller
In the last few years, scientists have become increasingly interested in studying the potential effects of pornography on viewers. Several studies have been published, but many of them have yielded conflicting results. Some have found that porn use is linked to negative outcomes, others to positive outcomes, and yet others have found no effects at all. What accounts for this? It may have to do with the way that “porn use” is typically measured in research.
In a recent article over at Playboy, I discuss the results of a new study from the Journal of Sex Research, which suggests some of the most commonly used measures of porn use (e.g., “How often do you watch pornography?”) are problematic. The issue is that “porn” means different things to different people. Consequently, when you measure porn use in such a generic way, you don’t really know what it is that you’re capturing. Check out the full article for a closer look at this study. I think you’ll find the incredible variability in what people consider to be “pornographic” fascinating.
Want to learn more about Sex and Psychology? Click here for more from the blog or here to listen to the podcast. Follow Sex and Psychology on Facebook, Twitter (@JustinLehmiller), or Reddit to receive updates. You can also follow Dr. Lehmiller on YouTube and Instagram.
Image Source: 123RF/Agata Gladykowska
Dr. Justin Lehmiller
Founder & Owner of Sex and PsychologyDr. Justin Lehmiller is a social psychologist and Research Fellow at The Kinsey Institute. He runs the Sex and Psychology blog and podcast and is author of the popular book Tell Me What You Want. Dr. Lehmiller is an award-winning educator, and a prolific researcher who has published more than 50 academic works.
Read full bio >